Assignment Model In Management Science

  • [1]

    Bozdağ, C.E., Kahraman, C. & Ruan, D. (2003). Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry, 51(1): 13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [2]

    Boran, F.E., Genç, S., Kurt, M. & Akay, D. (2009). A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8): 11363–11368CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [3]

    Bordogna, G., Fedrizzi, M. & Pasi, G. (1997). A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 27(1): 126–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [4]

    Chiclana, F., Herrera, F. & Herrera-Viedma, E. (1998). Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 97(1): 33–48MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [5]

    Chou, S.Y., Chang, Y.H. & Shen, C.Y. (2008). A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective /subjective attributes. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1): 132–145MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [6]

    Chuu, S.J. (2009). Selecting the advanced manufacturing technology using fuzzy multiple attributes group decision making with multiple fuzzy information. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57(3): 1033–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [7]

    Cook, W.D. & Kress, M. (1992). Ordinal Information and Preference Structures: Decision Models and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

  • [8]

    Cook, W.D. (2006). Distance-based and ad hoc consensus models in ordinal preference ranking. European Journal of Operational Research, 172(2): 369–385MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [9]

    Delgado, M., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E. & Martínez, L. (1998). Combining numerical and linguistic information in group decision making. Information Sciences, 107(1–4): 177–194MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [10]

    Fan, Z.P., Liu, Y. & Sun, Y.H. (2008). An approach to solve multi-objective assignment problems with ordinal interval ranking information. Industrial Engineering and Management, 13(3): 42–45 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

  • [11]

    Fan, Z.P. & Liu, Y. (2010). An approach to solve group-decision-making problems with ordinal interval numbers. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 40(5): 1413–1423MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [12]

    Fan, Z.P., Yue, Q., Feng, B. & Liu, Y. (2010). An approach to group decision-making with uncertain preference ordinals. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 58(1): 51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [13]

    González-Pachón, J. & Romero, C. (1999). Distance-based consensus methods: a goal programming approach. OMEGA, 27(3): 341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [14]

    González-Pachón, J. & Romero, C. (2001). Aggregation of partial ordinal rankings: an interval goal programming approach. Computers & Operations Research, 28(8): 827–834MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [15]

    González-Pachón, J., Rodríguez-Galiano, M.I. & Romero, C. (2003). Transitive approximation to pairwise comparison matrices by using interval goal programming. Journal of Operational Research Society, 54(5): 532–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [16]

    Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E. & Verdegay, J.L. (1995). A sequential selection process in group decision making with a linguistic assessment approach. Information Sciences, 85(4): 223–239MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [17]

    Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E. & Chiclana, F. (2001). Multi-person decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(2): 372–385MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [18]

    Hwang, C.L. & Lin, M.J. (1987). Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, BerlinMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [19]

    Li, D.F. (1998). Two new methods for multiattribute decision makings with information partially known. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 7(1): 70–74Google Scholar

  • [20]

    Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar

  • [21]

    Sanayei, A., Farid Mousavi, S., Abdi, M.R. & Mohaghar, A. (2008). An integrated group decision-making process for supplier selection and order allocation using multi-attribute utility theory and linear programming. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 345(7): 731–747MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [22]

    Sengupta, A. & Pal, T.K. (2000). On comparing interval numbers. European Journal of Operational Research, 127(1): 28–43MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [23]

    Wang, Y.M. & Fan, Z.P. (2007). Fuzzy preference relations: Aggregation and weight determination. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 53(1): 163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [24]

    Wu, J., Li, J.C., Li, H. & Duan, W.Q. (2009). The induced continuous ordered weighted geometric operators and their application in group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56(4): 1545–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [25]

    Xu, Z.S. (2001). Two methods for deriving members’ weights in group decision making. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 10(1): 15–19Google Scholar

  • [26]

    Yager, R.R., Detyniecki, M. & Bouchon-Meunier, B. (2001). A context-dependent method for ordering fuzzy numbers using probabilities. Information Sciences, 138(1–4): 237–255MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • [27]

    You, T.H., Fan, Z.P. & Yu, Z.C. (2007). A method for group decision making with preference information in ordinal interval form. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 28(2): 286–288 (in Chinese)MATHGoogle Scholar


    INTRODUCTIONTransportation models play an important role in logistics andsupply chain management for reducing cost and improvingservice. Therefore, the goal is to find the most cost effectiveway to transport the goods. Transportation problems areamong the most pressingstrategic developmentproblems inmany cities, often a major constraint for long-term urbandevelopment ingeneral, and very closely related to landdevelopment, economicstructure,energypolicies, andenvironmental quality. Since all citizens are either enjoyingthetransportation system or, and often at the same time,suffering from it, it is an important element of the urban qualityof life.The transportation problems is generally to be solved ,dealswith inefficiency of urban transportation systems andunderlying land use patterns, whichnegatively affect quality of life, economic efficiency, and the environment; the high(andoften hidden) costs of urban transportation in both socio-economic andenvironmental terms; and in particular theenvironmental consequences both in termsof physical aspectsthat include land and resource use, ecological aspects,andhuman health problems.Efficient tools for comprehensivestrategic analysis that are directly useful to cityadministrationsare lacking. New strategies for sustainable mobility requirewellbalanced combinations of measures with impacts on

    improved land-use/economic development planning;

    improved planning, management and use of transportinfrastructures andfacilities; incorporation of the realcosts of both infrastructure and environment ininvestment policies and decisions and also in user costs;

    development of public transport and improvement of itscompetitive position ,continued technical improvement of vehicles and fuels.

    incentives for the use of less polluting fuels; promotion of a more environmentally rational use of the private car,including behavioural changes.These problems can only be addressed with a consistent andcomprehensiveapproach and planning methodology that helpsto design strategies for sustainablecities. This has to include anintegration of socio-economic, environmental andtechnologicalconcepts including the development, integration,anddemonstration ofmethodologies to improve forecasting,assessment and strategic policy level decision

    Categories: 1

    0 Replies to “Assignment Model In Management Science”

    Leave a comment

    L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *